Arthur de Gobineau

What Gobineau Actually Wrote

In An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races, published in four volumes between 1853 and 1855, Gobineau argued that human races were fundamentally unequal in their capacities and that the rise and fall of civilizations could be explained by racial composition and, especially, by the effects of racial mixing. He proposed a hierarchy with a racial group he called “Aryan” at its summit, and argued that the mixing of this group with others led inexorably to civilizational decline. Gobineau’s argument was pessimistic in its own terms: he believed racial mixing across history had already proceeded so far that decline was effectively irreversible, and he did not propose a program of state racial policy to prevent it — a distinction later racial nationalists who invoked him did not always preserve.

Historical Influence

Gobineau’s work found only modest attention in France during his lifetime but was taken up enthusiastically in Germany later in the nineteenth century. The composer Richard Wagner was an admirer, and members of the Bayreuth circle around Wagner helped promote Gobineau’s ideas. In 1894, Ludwig Schemann founded the Gobineau Society (Gobineau-Vereinigung) in Germany specifically to study and disseminate his work, and the society became a channel through which Gobineau’s racial framework fed into the broader völkisch and racial-nationalist currents of German thought that later intersected with Nazi ideology. Gobineau’s emphasis on Aryan racial superiority was an influence on Houston Stewart Chamberlain, whose own later synthesis was more directly absorbed into Nazi racial doctrine.

Disputed Scholarly Interpretation

Historians of racial thought, including Michael Biddiss, describe Gobineau as a foundational, though not uncomplicated, figure in the history of scientific racism: his Essay supplied a systematic pseudo-scientific vocabulary of racial hierarchy that later writers repurposed, while his own aristocratic pessimism and disinterest in political program set him apart from the explicitly activist racial nationalism of his German successors. Scholars debate how much responsibility to assign Gobineau himself, as opposed to the German reception organized around Schemann and the Gobineau Society, for the more virulent and politically weaponized racial antisemitism that emerged in Germany decades after his death — a reception Gobineau, who died in 1882, did not live to see or endorse in its later form.

Sources